11.5 C
Wednesday, March 22, 2023
HomeAfricaCollege Football Playoffs: A BCI Debate

College Football Playoffs: A BCI Debate


Related stories

CDC: Candida auris fungus is growing in U.S. hospitals

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,...

Microsoft will modify the default applications system in Windows 11

Since customers complained about several problems, tech giant Microsoft...

Taliban GDI team makes a covert trip to Islamabad.

ISLAMABAD/KABUL: According to reports, an Afghan Taliban group made...

Government funding delays may cause an increase in dengue cases.

PESHAWAR: All inhabitants are at risk from dengue fever....

Curtis: Any opinions on this?

Arthur about BCI

Arthur: I’d hope with automatic bidding.

Grant’s views About BCI

Grant: You might believe.

Adam’s views about BCI

Adam: Yes, six each from the B1G and the SEC.

Views of Curtis About BCI

Curtis: According to reports from earlier this week, it would follow the format put out last year, which would entail auto bids for the six highest-ranked conference champions and byes for the top four. I’m not sure if they’ll keep to it, though, if it starts in 2026 and 1-3 conferences have already folded by then.

What does Joe say about BCI?

Joe: That would be fantastic, of course. If that occurs, I’m totally committed to dropping down to the fifth or sixth-best conference. The best case scenario we can aspire for as BC supporters are to play against peer programs, have the rare NFL-type player but otherwise maybe a little lower tier but still good, & have the occasional dream pathway to go to the playoff and be ass pounded but it would be entertaining. As long as conferences 3-6 have postseason access they’ll get their share of strong players.

Arthur: Yes, it is somewhat similar to where we are right now.

Joe’s supporting views about BCI

Joe: It will be similar to supporting a team in a second-tier European league. Champion’s League, please. then pass away.

Arthur: Denying the existence of Clemson.

Curtis: Who can honestly affirm the existence of Clemson?

Arthur: In all honesty, that represents the ideal situation for college athletics. Providing nothing else occurs

Adam: If true, big:

Curtis: Hmmmm……

Grant: A LOT OF money, indeed.

Curtis: I can easily see them accelerating it for that reason.

Grant: A tournament with 12 teams will bring in SO MUCH MONEY, lol.

What does Adam think about BCI?

Adam: I’m not sure why it took them so long to reach this decision. Why do you believe that half of the teams in professional sports leagues compete in the playoffs?

Curtis: Old people become unhappy when there are more playoff teams. And old people rule CFB.

Adam: Baseball is the only sport with the fewest playoff teams because of this.

Arthur: We have to protect the invention’s historical integrity as it was only created a few years ago.

Curtis: I recently read a proposal for a 32-team NHL postseason with a play-in competition for the low seeds. ultimate source of income for a league with lower revenues

Curtis: How likely do you believe it is that there would be a 6-auto bid playoff in a scenario where the SEC and B1G control nearly all of the major conferences? You might expect the auto bids to be decreased.

Arthur Clarifies his views about BCI

Arthur: I recognize it. It at least creates the appearance. Having the same teams every year is, in fact, sort of dull and doesn’t make people want to tune in, which is the rating issue the CFP is running into. Long-term benefits of increased parity for the sport. College fans are passionate about their teams and schools, at the end of the day. They are less inclined to become engaged in the championship if their team isn’t in it. They won’t even bother watching the game if their team doesn’t play a significant role.

Joe about BCI

Joe: Correct, without a doubt. I believe that the suits are becoming more aware of this. There is undoubtedly value in having these significant power vs. power matchups frequently in super conferences. But a key part of college sports’ attraction is having various teams and the risk of an upset. The superpowers may actually get the best of both worlds in this situation. Because it must be assumed that there will always be 7 SEC/Big ten teams, there will be more playoff bids. So they produce the show more frequently. Because this is football and not basketball, where St. Mary’s runs are common, they will continue to dominate. However, the appearance of a chance will draw in more spectators, and the addition of new teams will spice things up. I’m honestly shocked that it’s actually occurring since it’s a win-win situation for everyone.
If we continue doing it this way for five years and the auto bud football teams consistently lose. That is the only thing that could change it. But in truth, every program with an insane fan following and a goal can cling to it if you get one Boise State Fiesta Bowl moment every 5 years or so.

Joe: The obvious downside risk whenever you grow a tournament is that the product will become less effective. However, I don’t believe there is a chance of it with 12 teams in as long as you still have about 85 power conference clubs in addition to your odd fantastic g5.
It somewhat brings things back into balance. In college football, the regular season used to be everything. With the playoff, that was kind of killed, and for many teams, games now feel much more meaningless because no one really cares about the sub-playoff bowls anymore. Therefore, in terms of making the regular season less attractive and significant. You kind of got the worst of both worlds.

This scenario makes it even more crucial since, in the event that you don’t win the conference title, the battle for an auto bid in the SEC or B1G will be tough. Then, more clubs have a chance to win the lottery for every other conference.
What happens to the bowls is the next question, but to be honest, who cares? They will continue to exist as ESPN and gamblers’ entertainment, as well as enjoyable games for players and career prospects. That’s essentially how things are right now. What the heck? They might be able to reinvent the bowls to give them more status now that we’ve torn the bandaid off of the many traditional elements. The top two teams from area X who aren’t in the playoff might potentially face off in the largest bowl games. Spicy.

Arthur Explains About BCI

Arthur: If you accept automatic bids from conferences in the bottom tier, I believe that you run the genuine risk of diluting it down. Alabama doesn’t have to demonstrate its ability to defeat the Sun Belt champion. With this strategy, they have struck a really nice mix between obtaining the finest auto bids they can, giving them a legal shortcut to entry without having to deal with red tape, and a sizable number of at-large bids as well. In this manner, a seat at the table is all but guaranteed for the PAC-12 (or whatever it ends up being), the ACC, and even the Big Ten. Even the AAC should enter fairly frequently, one would think.

Curtis explaining BCI

Curtis: Never undervalue the Sun Belt! However, I wholeheartedly concur that this format is among the best outcomes that could occur. Football Teams with 1-2 losses will have bigger stakes in the regular season; in the past, it felt like a loss or two would utterly end your chances of making the playoffs. Due to the fact that the reward of improving your resume now balances the danger of suffering an additional defeat, it will make for juicier out-of-conference scheduling.

Arthur: I should probably stop picking on them.

Curtis: And, as you both mentioned, it now includes all of college football in a manner that it did not before. It’s a format that generates more income for everyone while giving more schools a chance to succeed. And the NY6 bowls are now important matches against teams with 5-12 seeds rather than being afterthoughts!

Arthur: Do you mean it was detrimental to the sport for the Georgias and Alabamas of the world to pick on the Mississippis or whatever every year?

Grant: The top 4 teams receive byes in a 12-team tournament, so that is one major advantage. Unbeaten Alabama won’t be competing against, say, Central Michigan. You might have the AAC champion facing the Sun Belt champion, for example. After that, Bama will smoke them. But they’ll have gotten their huge playoff moment first!

Joe: Exactly! In sports, moments matter.

Arthur: It’s probably important to note that the wealthy will undoubtedly have more than the less fortunate. However, if your program now has a better chance than ever before of making the football playoffs, it will be more appealing to prospective students. Alabama and co. will still likely dominate, but it’s not, like, unfathomable for the big programs to star at least nominally coming back to be packed.

Joe: That is, after all, It. Or for a fifth-year player who has played in the middle at an SEC or B1G to believe that he can start for a football club that is one level lower and possibly lead them to the playoffs.

Arthur: And you don’t qualify for the playoffs if you’re not currently on like six teams.

Joe: That ship has sailed, so it won’t “level the playing field,” but it will give programs outside the Mega Two more chances to be significant.

Arthur: To make it more relatable for our readers, let’s compare it to NASCAR. Previously, only a small number of drivers were dominating the competition and the remainder were essentially fighting for scraps. Those guys are still the best on the field right now, but the new automobile has leveled the playing field for everyone. Even though the playing field is still not level, there are still certain cars that are better than others.

Joe: Good, I firmly believe that this is the best strategy for attracting readers of football. Agreed.

Read more About: On Labor Day, which restaurants are open?


- Never miss a story with notifications

- Gain full access to our premium content

- Browse free from up to 5 devices at once

Latest stories


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

%d bloggers like this: